Pennsylvania Mail-in Ballot Ruling Could Majorly Impact the 2024 Election
Pennsylvania Mail-in Ballot Ruling Could Majorly Impact the 2024 Election

If there’s one thing we’ve learned in recent elections, it’s that Pennsylvania might just be the battleground of battleground states. Between its 19 electoral votes, tight races, and chaotic vote-counting history, the state has become a flashpoint in every major election.

And now, with Trump facing off against Kamala Harris in 2024, Pennsylvania is once again in the spotlight. Both candidates need this state like air, and as of today, a brand-new court decision could be the game changer they didn’t see coming.

The 2020 election was a circus of mail-in ballots, delayed counts, and legal battles, with Pennsylvania smack in the middle of it all. If there was a questionable ballot or disputed result, chances are, it happened in the Keystone State.

With polls showing a razor-thin margin in multiple swing states, the 2024 election could be just as chaotic. But this time, the courts are stepping in before the chaos even begins.

From Fox News:
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled Friday that mail-in ballots without the correct dates on envelopes cannot be counted in elections, a decision which could prove crucial in this year’s presidential election where 19 electoral college votes are up for grabs.

The ruling was welcomed by Republicans as a victory for voter integrity in the hotly contested state, while voting rights advocates including the American Civil Liberties Union said they will look at pursuing additional legal options.

In a decision that has Republicans cheering and Democrats scrambling, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled that mail-in ballots without the correct dates on their envelopes won’t be counted in upcoming elections. This ruling comes right as the 2024 election kicks into high gear and could very well decide who walks into the Oval Office next January.

So, what does this mean for the 2024 election? In simple terms: everything. Pennsylvania’s 19 electoral votes are a must-win for Kamala Harris, who has been slipping in key swing states. But don’t think Trump isn’t sweating over this state either. Both candidates know that without Pennsylvania, the White House is just a distant dream.

Democrats, of course, are predictably up in arms about this ruling. Their golden ticket in the last election was the mail-in ballot system, which helped push Biden over the finish line in states like Pennsylvania. Voting rights advocates, including the ACLU, are already looking for ways to challenge the decision, because heaven forbid we ask people to write the correct date on an envelope.

Republicans Score a Win for Voter Integrity

Let’s be honest—this decision is a win for anyone who values election integrity. For too long, Democrats have pushed this narrative that any common-sense rule meant to safeguard the election process is somehow an attack on voting rights. Meanwhile, Republicans have been banging the drum for tighter rules around mail-in ballots, and for good reason. When half the country questions whether votes were counted properly in the last election, maybe it’s time to tighten things up, don’t you think?

The court’s decision to require correct dates on mail-in ballots isn’t some wild, unreasonable demand. We ask people to follow basic instructions all the time. Sign here, date here—how hard is that? If you can’t get the date right, maybe you shouldn’t be voting in the first place. Democrats love to pretend that these small requirements are “voter suppression,” but in reality, they’re just basic safeguards to make sure everyone’s vote is legitimate.

Republicans in Pennsylvania are understandably thrilled about the ruling. After watching the last election devolve into a mess of legal challenges and recounts, they see this as a step toward cleaner, more transparent elections. And let’s not forget—the more secure the process, the less likely we are to deal with another post-election circus like we saw in 2020.

The Stakes in Pennsylvania

Make no mistake: Pennsylvania is make-or-break for both Trump and Harris. Trump is looking to reclaim the state that helped him secure victory in 2016 but turned blue in 2020. Meanwhile, Harris is trying to hold on to any support she can get as swing states continue to slip through her fingers. The latest polls show that Pennsylvania is within the margin of error, which means this ruling could be the difference between a win and a loss come Election Day.

The stakes are sky-high, and this ruling only adds to the drama. If the election were held today, thousands of votes could be tossed out simply because voters didn’t follow basic instructions on their mail-in ballots. You can bet that both campaigns are taking note and strategizing on how to handle this in the coming months. For Republicans, it’s a major win that could help level the playing field in a state that’s been trending Democratic. For Democrats, it’s yet another hurdle they’ll have to overcome, and they’re already gearing up for a fight.

What Happens Next?

Of course, this is just the beginning. Democrats and their allies are already talking about “additional legal options,” which means more lawsuits and more chaos are likely on the horizon. Don’t be surprised if this ruling gets challenged all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. But for now, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has made its decision, and Republicans are ready to use this to their advantage in the 2024 race.

As the election gets closer, expect to hear more about Pennsylvania. The state is ground zero for both campaigns, and every little legal decision, poll shift, or scandal will be magnified tenfold. And with Trump’s base fired up and Harris’s campaign struggling to gain traction, the battle for Pennsylvania could be one for the history books.

Key Takeaways:

  • The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that mail-in ballots without correct dates cannot be counted.
  • Republicans see this as a win for voter integrity, while Democrats are scrambling for legal options.
  • With Pennsylvania as a crucial swing state, this ruling could play a big role in the 2024 election.

Source: Fox News

September 15, 2024
mm
Jon Brenner
Patriot Journal's Managing Editor has followed politics since he was a kid, with Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush as his role models. He hopes to see America return to limited government and the founding principles that made it the greatest nation in history.
Patriot Journal's Managing Editor has followed politics since he was a kid, with Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush as his role models. He hopes to see America return to limited government and the founding principles that made it the greatest nation in history.
Copyright © 2024 ThePatriotJournal.com