As the race for the White House heats up, one candidate seems to be dodging public scrutiny. Kamala Harris, despite her status as the Democratic nominee, has been avoiding press conferences or even an interview. It’s been over a month since she’s engaged with the press in any meaningful way, leaving many to wonder why someone running for the highest office in the land would choose to remain so tight-lipped.

This silence is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore, especially as voters are eager to hear concrete plans and policy proposals from those vying for their support.

Yet, Harris has consistently sidestepped opportunities to communicate directly with the American people. She has skipped town halls, interviews, and press conferences. This reluctance to engage raises questions not just about her campaign strategy, but about what’s really going on behind the scenes. Now, the New York Times has dropped a bomb on her.

From The Post Millennial:
As Vice President Kamala Harris has largely avoided the press for over a month now since becoming the Democratic nominee, the New York Times has called out her lack of policy prescriptions as well as her refusal to the media in a long-form interview or press conference…

The “21 Questions for Harris” piece begins with the criticism of the nominee, who has provided few and far between answers about policy positions as well as what she exactly plans to do when she gets into office.

Kamala Harris has been missing in action. For over a month, she has avoided the press like it’s an inconvenient ex. Since becoming the Democratic nominee, she’s been practically invisible when it comes to addressing the public or laying out her policies. The New York Times, never one to hold back, has taken notice. In a blistering piece titled “21 Questions for Harris,” the Times didn’t just raise an eyebrow—they raised the roof on Harris’ conspicuous silence.

The Times didn’t pull any punches. They highlighted her complete lack of media engagement since the campaign kicked off. No town halls. No extended interviews. Nada. It’s as if she’s playing hide and seek with the American public, and she’s winning. But the real question is: why? What’s behind this radio silence? The Times isn’t just asking—they’re demanding answers.

The piece divides its questions into four hot-button categories: the economy, social issues, foreign policy, and the ever-elusive “politics and more.” One of the most scathing questions addresses her economic stance. Harris has floated some eyebrow-raising ideas about price control policies. The kind that would make even the most liberal economists squirm. A CNN contributor didn’t mince words, comparing her proposals to the failed policies of Venezuela and the Soviet Union. Ouch.

Then there’s her flip-flopping on immigration. The Times didn’t shy away from calling her out on it. Once, she was all for decriminalizing illegal border crossings. Now, she’s suddenly an immigration hawk, promising to secure the border better than Trump. But her actions tell a different story. The Biden-Harris administration’s current policies are a far cry from tough on immigration. They’ve backed proposals that would let nearly anyone into the country under the guise of asylum, even without a valid claim. And let’s not forget that she once called the border wall a “vanity project.” Now, she’s claiming to support it. Talk about a 180-degree turn.

The Times also tackled Harris’ stance on policing. Remember her support for the Defund the Police movement? She once praised the idea that communities could be safe without law enforcement. Now, her campaign seems to be walking that back. But the Times isn’t letting her off the hook. They want to know: does she still believe fewer police make us safer? Or was that just another talking point she’s ready to discard?

Kamala Harris might think she can dodge the press, but the questions aren’t going away. The longer she stays silent, the louder the criticism will grow. The New York Times has thrown down the gauntlet. It’s time for Harris to pick it up and face the music.

Key Takeaways:

• Kamala Harris has avoided the press for over a month since becoming the Democratic nominee, leading to criticism from the media.
• The New York Times published a piece highlighting Harris’ lack of policy clarity, questioning her stances on issues like the economy, immigration, and policing.
• Harris has been called out for flip-flopping on key issues, including her previous support for decriminalizing illegal border crossings and her stance on the border wall.

Source: The Post Millennial